Underwrite Construction Risk With Visibility Into the Plans.
Pre-construction AI plan review surfaces coordination risk before the loan closes — a data point that’s been invisible until now.
You underwrite the sponsor, the market, and the budget — but the drawings themselves have always been a black box. Coordination risk sits inside them, unpriced, until it shows up as a cost overrun.
What you’re up against
Three things every construction lender lives with.
You can read a budget, but not whether the set that budget is based on is coordinated.
By the time a coordination-driven change order hits, the loan is closed and the risk is yours.
Without visibility into the plans, the coordination line in the contingency is a number, not an assessment.
Sources: Navigant Construction Forum, The Impact of Rework on Construction (2012); Autodesk & FMI (2021).
Here’s what changes
Independent review as a condition of close
A coordination check in your diligence checklist.
A conflict report as a diligence artifact
A document for the file, not a verbal assurance.
Findings describe the documents, not fault
Objective risk data, not a liability opinion.
Every discipline, one pass
Each of these is read against every other one — that cross-reference is where the conflicts live. See the finding types that come back, with real examples from the published reports, or read where this is the wrong tool for the job.
Make coordination risk visible.
Your first preview is free · same-day turnaround.
The pre-IFC coordination checklist
50 checks before you issue for construction, ordered by what actually goes wrong — built from 1,516 findings across 34 real plan sets. Comes as an assignable tracker (Excel) with status, owner and due date, plus a printable PDF. No call, no card.