Before you upload

Is Flikt.AI a good fit for your project?

A straight answer, including the projects it is wrong for. It costs a great deal less to find that out here than after the set is uploaded.

Get my free preview →
See what the review checks

Every tool publishes who it is for. The more useful half of the question is who it is not for, and almost nobody publishes that — so buyers work it out afterwards, which is the expensive way to learn it.

Flikt.AI does one narrow thing: it reads a set of construction documents and reports where they contradict each other. The narrowness is what makes it fast. Here is where that lands well, where it does not, and the handful of questions that actually decide it.

Fit criteria

Where this lands well, and where it does not

Neither column is a hedge. If your project sits in the right-hand one, the honest answer is that another instrument will serve you better, and we would rather say so now.

✓A good fit when…
The drawings are all you have.No federated model, no live clash workflow — a PDF set that several design teams produced separately and nobody read against each other. That is the ordinary condition on light-commercial, multifamily and residential work, and it is the condition this was built for.
More than one discipline is in the upload.Nearly every finding is a cross-reference between two sets. The conflict is not on either sheet by itself, which is why a discipline-by-discipline review does not surface it. The more of the project you send, the more there is to find.
You have the specifications.A large share of findings come from a drawing contradicting a spec section. Drawings-only uploads still return a real review, but they rule out a whole category of finding before it starts.
Nothing has been built yet.Bid documents, a permit set, the revision that landed this morning. Findings are worth most while the fix is still a redline and not a demolition.
Somebody is going to read the findings.Every finding names its sheets and quotes the language it read, because the next step is a person opening that sheet and deciding. Your team keeps the judgement; the review just makes sure the question reached them.
Somebody was supposed to read this set and hasn’t.Contractors, developers who run their own coordination, and owner’s representatives get the most out of this: they hold the change order when a conflict surfaces in the field, and they can open the cited sheet and check the call.
×Not the right tool when…
You don’t have a set yet.Findings live in the documents. Until there is a set in design or in permitting, there is nothing to read. Come back when the drawings exist; the review is the same price then.
You need a quantity takeoff.Flikt.AI does not measure, count or price scope. Nothing it hands back is a quantity, and it is not the instrument to buy if that is the job.
You already run clash detection on live models.If federated models exist and are actually maintained, that workflow answers the geometry question better than any document review can. It is a different job and we are not a replacement for it.
The upload is a single discipline.With nothing to check it against, one set gets a document-quality read and little else. The value is in the cross-references, so a one-discipline upload spends the review on its weakest half.
You want a sealed opinion.This is not a licensed design professional’s review and it is not a jurisdiction’s plan check. It finds contradictions in the documents; deciding what they mean is a qualified person’s call.
You need somebody to resolve it for you.Findings come back written the way an RFI is written, ready to forward. Sending them, chasing them and negotiating the answer is still your team’s work.
You are hoping it replaces your reviewers.It does not. It reads the whole set in one pass and hands back the contradictions. Which of them are real, which are already resolved, and which are worth an RFI is a judgement your people make, on your project.
The question under all of this

How long does the answer take?

Fit is usually decided by the calendar. Bids close, permits are due, and a review that arrives after the decision was made is not a review. Turnaround is not a setting on any of these — it follows from how each one works.

Flikt.AISame dayNothing waits in a queue for someone to get to it. The turnaround is the run itself, so a set uploaded in the morning is a report you are reading before the day is out.
A manual coordination reviewScoped in weeksSomebody has to read every sheet, then read it again against all the others. The schedule is a consequence of that arithmetic, not a choice anyone made, and it does not compress because your bid date moved.
A general-purpose AI chatbotInstant, one document at a timeFast because it only ever looks at what you paste into it. A coordination conflict lives between two sheets, so it is never inside the window — and the answer arrives with the same confidence either way.
Still deciding

Questions that settle it

What kinds of projects is Flikt.AI a good fit for?

Documented building projects where the coordination set is 2D PDFs rather than a maintained 3D model, and where more than one discipline is in the upload — multifamily, single-family, retail and tenant buildout, hospitality, office, institutional, industrial and renovation work. What decides the outcome is the completeness of the set, not the building type or its size.

When is Flikt.AI not the right tool?

When you need a quantity takeoff, when federated models already exist and a clash workflow is running on them, when the upload is a single discipline with nothing to cross-reference, or when what you actually need is a sealed professional opinion or a jurisdiction’s plan check. It reads documents and reports contradictions; those are different jobs.

Do I need the specifications, or are the drawings enough?

Drawings alone return a real review, but a large share of findings come from a drawing contradicting a spec section, so a drawings-only upload leaves that category unread. Send the whole set you issued, addenda included. If brand standards came with the set, those are cross-checked against the drawings the same way.

Is this a replacement for a design professional’s review?

No. Flikt.AI reads what the documents say and reports where they disagree with each other. Every finding cites the sheets and quotes the language behind it precisely so a qualified person can open that sheet, confirm or reject it, and decide what it means for the project.

How small a project is too small?

Size is the wrong axis. Because the review is document-based, what matters is whether there is more than one discipline to read against another. A single-family residence issued with a full discipline set is a real review; a two-sheet permit drawing has nothing to cross-reference and will come back thin.

The cheapest way to find out is to try it

Upload a set and read what comes back. The first preview is free, and it answers this page better than this page does.

Get my free preview →
Test it on a project you already built

1